<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: wild card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dansanders.net/2008/07/03/wild-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dansanders.net/2008/07/03/wild-card/</link>
	<description>building a bias for action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:57:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.dansanders.net/2008/07/03/wild-card/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dansanders.net/?p=54#comment-131</guid>
		<description>It was released late June in &#039;89, so we didn&#039;t skip a class to go see it - not that we would have done that, anyway...

I haven&#039;t seen Capote yet; every time I think about it I forget later.  I need to grab the two and watch them both.  I&#039;ve always been a fan of PSH, too.  

Ideas on who the competition will be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was released late June in &#8217;89, so we didn&#8217;t skip a class to go see it &#8211; not that we would have done that, anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen Capote yet; every time I think about it I forget later.  I need to grab the two and watch them both.  I&#8217;ve always been a fan of PSH, too.  </p>
<p>Ideas on who the competition will be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.dansanders.net/2008/07/03/wild-card/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dansanders.net/?p=54#comment-130</guid>
		<description>And you saw the first one with me, if I remember correctly.

Ledger is getting a lot of Oscar buzz for sure.  He wasn&#039;t going to win for Brokeback because Hoffman wasn&#039;t going to be denied for his portrayal of Capote.  The Academy was in the midst of a little biopic obsession then.  
But, you are right, it is not traditionally the type film that warrants Oscar love.  I think he will get a nomination because he has engendered good will and, a la James Dean, died too young with a world of promise.  But, as in Dean&#039;s case, that is not enough to ensure a win.  It should be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you saw the first one with me, if I remember correctly.</p>
<p>Ledger is getting a lot of Oscar buzz for sure.  He wasn&#8217;t going to win for Brokeback because Hoffman wasn&#8217;t going to be denied for his portrayal of Capote.  The Academy was in the midst of a little biopic obsession then.<br />
But, you are right, it is not traditionally the type film that warrants Oscar love.  I think he will get a nomination because he has engendered good will and, a la James Dean, died too young with a world of promise.  But, as in Dean&#8217;s case, that is not enough to ensure a win.  It should be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

